So if I do a commit and it comes back with revision 1817 at the time of the commit, and then I update the bug and write r1817, and then subsequently click on r1817 - it will show the wrong revision? Meaning I should have written r1818?
ÃÂ
p
ÃÂ
Message: 8
Subject:ÃÂ [Amportal-devel] Re: Amportal-devel digest, Vol 1 #507 - 16
From: "Bentley" <ryan-lists@coalescentsystems.ca>
Date: Tue,ÃÂ 2 May 2006 13:49:11 -0600
To: amportal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Reply-To: amportal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Bentley wrote:
Quote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:19, Philippe Lindheimer wrote:>ÃÂ SUGGESTION TO EVERYONE:
>
>ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ When we commit and it addresses something in a specific bug (or set of
>ÃÂ bugs), let's put the bug number(s) in the commit message as well as putting
>ÃÂ the Rev number (Change Set number) in the ticket(s) that we close.
>FYI: Trac will turn revision numbers and ticket numbers into links if
formatted like:r1734
#701Ryan
One other think I should mention is that the revision numbers in Trac are always 1 ahead of the
actual revision number.ÃÂ I'm not sure there is a way around this.
I use SVK to mirror the sf.net svn repo locally:
When SVK pulls changes, it does something like:
# svk sync //amportal
Syncing https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/amportal
Retrieving log information from 1815 to 1815
Committed revision 1816 from revision 1815.
... so r1815 in sf.net svn is saved as r1816 locally.ÃÂ Very frustrating.ÃÂ I went on #svk irc today
in search of a solution.ÃÂ The only response was "there's no easy solution".ÃÂ [sigh].
Ryan
-------------------- m2f --------------------
Sent using Mail2Forum (http://www.mail2forum.com).
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.freepbx.org/viewtopic.php?p=47#47
-------------------- m2f --------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone [url=http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman9/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com... to 30+ countries[/url] for just 2â/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://www.mail2forum.com)