[Amportal-devel] Re: Amportal-devel digest, Vol 1 #510 - 14

1 post / 0 new
Bentley
Bentley's picture
[Amportal-devel] Re: Amportal-devel digest, Vol 1 #510 - 14

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 14:35, Philippe Lindheimer wrote:
Quote:

So if I do a commit and it comes back with revision 1817 at the time of the
commit, and then I update the bug and write r1817, and then subsequently
click on r1817 - it will show the wrong revision? Meaning I should have
written r1818?

Well, good question. I think we should still use the "real" sf.net revision
number, as that's what we would need to use with interacting with SVN.

Currently, the SVK (svn mirror) revisions are only 1 ahead of SVN. It's
unclear to me if this delta will remain a constant.

So, let's use the real rev number. If you want to view patches by revision
number, i suggest you use sf.net's viewvc interface:

http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/amportal/

Ryan

Quote:

p

Message: 8
Subject: [Amportal-devel] Re: Amportal-devel digest, Vol 1 #507 - 16
From: "Bentley"
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:49:11 -0600
To: eval(unescape('%64%6f%63%75%6d%65%6e%74%2e%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3c%61%20%68%72%65%66%3d%22%6d%61%69%6c%74%6f%3a%61%6d%70%6f%72%74%61%6c%2d%64%65%76%65%6c%40%6c%69%73%74%73%2e%73%6f%75%72%63%65%66%6f%72%67%65%2e%6e%65%74%22%3e%61%6d%70%6f%72%74%61%6c%2d%64%65%76%65%6c%40%6c%69%73%74%73%2e%73%6f%75%72%63%65%66%6f%72%67%65%2e%6e%65%74%3c%2f%61%3e%27%29%3b'))
Reply-To: eval(unescape('%64%6f%63%75%6d%65%6e%74%2e%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3c%61%20%68%72%65%66%3d%22%6d%61%69%6c%74%6f%3a%61%6d%70%6f%72%74%61%6c%2d%64%65%76%65%6c%40%6c%69%73%74%73%2e%73%6f%75%72%63%65%66%6f%72%67%65%2e%6e%65%74%22%3e%61%6d%70%6f%72%74%61%6c%2d%64%65%76%65%6c%40%6c%69%73%74%73%2e%73%6f%75%72%63%65%66%6f%72%67%65%2e%6e%65%74%3c%2f%61%3e%27%29%3b'))

Bentley wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:19, Philippe Lindheimer wrote:
> > SUGGESTION TO EVERYONE:
> >
> > When we commit and it addresses something in a specific bug (or set
> > of bugs), let's put the bug number(s) in the commit message as well as
> > putting the Rev number (Change Set number) in the ticket(s) that we
> > close.
>
> FYI: Trac will turn revision numbers and ticket numbers into links if
> formatted like:
>
> r1734
> #701
>
> Ryan

One other think I should mention is that the revision numbers in Trac are
always 1 ahead of the actual revision number. I'm not sure there is a way
around this.

I use SVK to mirror the sf.net svn repo locally:

http://svk.elixus.org/

When SVK pulls changes, it does something like:

# svk sync //amportal
Syncing https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/amportal
Retrieving log information from 1815 to 1815
Committed revision 1816 from revision 1815.

... so r1815 in sf.net svn is saved as r1816 locally. Very frustrating. I
went on #svk irc today in search of a solution. The only response was
"there's no easy solution". [sigh].

Ryan

---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just
2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Amportal-devel mailing list
eval(unescape('%64%6f%63%75%6d%65%6e%74%2e%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3c%61%20%68%72%65%66%3d%22%6d%61%69%6c%74%6f%3a%41%6d%70%6f%72%74%61%6c%2d%64%65%76%65%6c%40%6c%69%73%74%73%2e%73%6f%75%72%63%65%66%6f%72%67%65%2e%6e%65%74%22%3e%41%6d%70%6f%72%74%61%6c%2d%64%65%76%65%6c%40%6c%69%73%74%73%2e%73%6f%75%72%63%65%66%6f%72%67%65%2e%6e%65%74%3c%2f%61%3e%27%29%3b'))
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amportal-devel

Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://www.mail2forum.com)